Re: Ponds and guns

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-21-2007, 01:00 PM


LOL! I'm all for innovative solutions.
I once wrote an article for Helen Nash's
now defunct Pond and Garden magazine about disabled
pond keepers. This was one hint I didn't uncover.

DH has taken to a weed flame thrower in a big
way. He has been flame throwing what is left of
the old frog bog. He uses it all over the yard
and only managed to set the wooden fence on
fire once.



************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone.
Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.



Kthirtya@aol.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-21-2007, 01:49 PM
Galen Hekhuis
 
Posts: n/a
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:00:23 CST, wrote:

>LOL! I'm all for innovative solutions.
>I once wrote an article for Helen Nash's
>now defunct Pond and Garden magazine about disabled
>pond keepers. This was one hint I didn't uncover.
>
>DH has taken to a weed flame thrower in a big
>way. He has been flame throwing what is left of
>the old frog bog. He uses it all over the yard
>and only managed to set the wooden fence on
>fire once.


I got one of those weed burning devices that uses a propane bottle and
has a long wand. I didn't catch the fence on fire, but I got the lawn
going pretty good. Got my shoes pretty good too as I tried to stomp
out the fire on the lawn. I got the fire out OK and everything but I
decided that burning weeds was not for me.

But that isn't what made me decide to shoot weeds. I was shooting at
paper targets with a pellet trap and all when I got a little bit bored
with the paper target and aimed at a nearby weed. At first I was just
happy to hit the weed anywhere, but as I got better I learned to shoot
at the base of the weed, and I found I could do considerable damage to
it. For sure, the "grab at the base and pull it out" method is
perhaps the most effective, but not nearly as fun.
--
Galen Hekhuis
Illiterate? Write for FREE help

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-21-2007, 02:54 PM
©anadian Ponder
 
Posts: n/a
Galen Hekhuis wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:00:23 CST, wrote:
>
>> LOL! I'm all for innovative solutions.
>> I once wrote an article for Helen Nash's
>> now defunct Pond and Garden magazine about disabled
>> pond keepers. This was one hint I didn't uncover.
>>
>> DH has taken to a weed flame thrower in a big
>> way. He has been flame throwing what is left of
>> the old frog bog. He uses it all over the yard
>> and only managed to set the wooden fence on
>> fire once.

>
> I got one of those weed burning devices that uses a propane bottle and
> has a long wand. I didn't catch the fence on fire, but I got the lawn
> going pretty good. Got my shoes pretty good too as I tried to stomp
> out the fire on the lawn. I got the fire out OK and everything but I
> decided that burning weeds was not for me.
>
> But that isn't what made me decide to shoot weeds. I was shooting at
> paper targets with a pellet trap and all when I got a little bit bored
> with the paper target and aimed at a nearby weed. At first I was just
> happy to hit the weed anywhere, but as I got better I learned to shoot
> at the base of the weed, and I found I could do considerable damage to
> it. For sure, the "grab at the base and pull it out" method is
> perhaps the most effective, but not nearly as fun.
> --
> Galen Hekhuis
> Illiterate? Write for FREE help
>


If you don't get the weed at the root then won't it just grow back ??

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-21-2007, 03:26 PM
Galen Hekhuis
 
Posts: n/a
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:54:41 CST, ©anadian Ponder <"
"@greatnowhere.com> wrote:

>If you don't get the weed at the root then won't it just grow back ??


Yeah, but I just don't shoot 'em just once. I nail them again and
again, and most of the time if you fuss with them enough they
eventually give up. Sometimes I have to actually yank them out by
hand, but I do a fair job with the gun. Lots of times I use a scope,
and can place a shot right at the base of the stem if there is one.
There are some things like grasses and stuff that spread out and make
it pretty hard to find the base, and those have to be dealt with by
alternative means. Some do grow back, but that just gives me
something to shoot at later. It isn't the only way to weed, but it is
a way to get to those hard to reach areas (which for me can be just
about anywhere).
--
Galen Hekhuis
Illiterate? Write for FREE help

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-21-2007, 11:02 PM
~ jan
 
Posts: n/a
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:49:11 CST, Galen Hekhuis <>
wrote:

>I got one of those weed burning devices that uses a propane bottle and
>has a long wand. I didn't catch the fence on fire, but I got the lawn
>going pretty good. Got my shoes pretty good too as I tried to stomp
>out the fire on the lawn. I got the fire out OK and everything but I
>decided that burning weeds was not for me.
>
>But that isn't what made me decide to shoot weeds. I was shooting at
>paper targets with a pellet trap and all when I got a little bit bored
>with the paper target and aimed at a nearby weed. At first I was just
>happy to hit the weed anywhere, but as I got better I learned to shoot
>at the base of the weed, and I found I could do considerable damage to
>it. For sure, the "grab at the base and pull it out" method is
>perhaps the most effective, but not nearly as fun.


The newest sport in gardening, or how to get your kids to weed the garden.

I wonder if we'll have to worry about PETV? People for the Ethical
Treatment of Vegetation. ;-) ~ jan
------------
Zone 7a, SE Washington State

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-22-2007, 06:43 AM
2pods
 
Posts: n/a
"~ jan" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:49:11 CST, Galen Hekhuis <>
> wrote:
>
>>I got one of those weed burning devices that uses a propane bottle and
>>has a long wand. I didn't catch the fence on fire, but I got the lawn
>>going pretty good. Got my shoes pretty good too as I tried to stomp
>>out the fire on the lawn. I got the fire out OK and everything but I
>>decided that burning weeds was not for me.
>>
>>But that isn't what made me decide to shoot weeds. I was shooting at
>>paper targets with a pellet trap and all when I got a little bit bored
>>with the paper target and aimed at a nearby weed. At first I was just
>>happy to hit the weed anywhere, but as I got better I learned to shoot
>>at the base of the weed, and I found I could do considerable damage to
>>it. For sure, the "grab at the base and pull it out" method is
>>perhaps the most effective, but not nearly as fun.

>
> The newest sport in gardening, or how to get your kids to weed the garden.
>
> I wonder if we'll have to worry about PETV? People for the Ethical
> Treatment of Vegetation. ;-) ~ jan
> ------------
> Zone 7a, SE Washington State


Is that the little yellow pellets or the silver crimbly ones ?

I got what in the US would be called a BB pistol to shoot at the bird table
roof which scared the pigeons trying to eat stuff for the smaller birds.
However, it wasn't powerful enough when there was the slightest puff of
wind.

I think I should try an Air Bazooka.
I wonder what that would do to Blanketweed ?
;-)

Peter

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-22-2007, 09:37 AM
Galen Hekhuis
 
Posts: n/a
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 05:43:08 CST, "2pods" <> wrote:


>Is that the little yellow pellets or the silver crimbly ones ?
>
>I got what in the US would be called a BB pistol to shoot at the bird table
>roof which scared the pigeons trying to eat stuff for the smaller birds.
>However, it wasn't powerful enough when there was the slightest puff of
>wind.
>
>I think I should try an Air Bazooka.
>I wonder what that would do to Blanketweed ?
>;-)
>
>Peter


I got the all metal type, there was a kind with a plastic part,
different colors for different calibers, but I didn't want a whole lot
of little plastic parts lying around the pond. I can't really say
that having a bunch of spent metal pellets is such a great idea, but
at least I don't notice them and they haven't been a hassle so far.

As to power, there are pellet guns and there are pellet guns. Some
are pretty useless, you can almost blow as hard. Others can pack
quite a punch, and it is not uncommon to find fairly inexpensive
pellet guns with a muzzle velocity exceeding many .22 firearms. I
think I remember from reading that there are restrictions to power in
air guns in many countries, so they may not be very effective in some
areas. Granted, the pellets are lighter than those made of lead,
but at 10-25 yards I find it takes a fairly stiff breeze before my
shots are bothered much. Besides, windage is one of those things
shooter has to address.
--
Galen Hekhuis
Illiterate? Write for FREE help

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
2007 Garden Pond Forum