Phyllis and Jim wrote:
> I concur that we do not want to have our pond forum a general
> discussion forum, or overloaded by conflict or disturbing topics or OT
> debates.
This post took me a while to compose, mostly because I want to generate
the right 'tone' (not always easy to do using written, non-graphical media).
I know I'm a newbie (to this group), but I am bothered by the desire for
having to be ultra PC. For example, I am on this group because I am in
the very beginning stages of designing and digging my first pond. The
purpose of this pond is primarily for the training of retrievers for
hunting waterfowl. Related to that is that I am a member of a local
retriever club; some of whom have a whole set of ponds for training dogs
- all with different designs and dimensions for teaching dogs different
concepts of making them a better hunting companion. I might even be
inclined to mention the pond design diagrams produced by Rex Carr
(considered by many to be the 'Bible of retriever training pond design').
Which means, I'm between a rock and a hard place. It would appear that
some are bothered by me being a hunter. But for me, it is the reason
for having a pond. Is it possible for me to participate here, with some
of my messages talking about hunting (as it relates to the pond),
without offending some?
--
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes
Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes
"Usenet really is all about standing around and hitting the ground
with clubs, on a spot where many years earlier a dead horse lay."