Pond Contraptions: What are they, and do they really serve a useful purpose?

Which items do you have or use in your pond.

  • Water Pumps

  • Aerators

  • Bio-filters

  • Mechanical Filters

  • Fountains, spitters, etc...

  • Waterfalls

  • Bottom Drains

  • Skimmers

  • UV clarifiers & sterilizers

  • Pressure filters

  • Pond Vacuums

  • Pond De-icers

  • Pond Salt

  • Bottled bacteria

  • Barley Straw

  • Water Conditioners (De-Chlorinators)

  • pH Adjusters

  • Ionizers

  • Chemical Algae Control Products

  • Protein Skimmers


Results are only viewable after voting.
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
1,993
Reaction score
1,786
Location
BC Canada
We all have devices or things we use in our ponds that we believe are beneficial for maintaining our ponds, but do they actually do anything useful? are they really necessary? or are there other ways of achieving the same results naturally.
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
13,070
Reaction score
13,394
Location
Northern IL
Showcase(s):
1
I don't know that I would have included waterfalls in this list. At least not separate from water pump as you wouldn't have one without the other.

Good discussion topic! For us, less is more. The less I have to intervene the happier I am!
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
1,993
Reaction score
1,786
Location
BC Canada
I don't know that I would have included waterfalls in this list. At least not separate from water pump as you wouldn't have one without the other.
Oh sure, there are many ponds I've seen that just pump their water through spitters or fountains and don't have waterfalls. I also listed Pressure filters separate from bio and mechanical filters although pressure filters usually try to include both, but as far as I'm concerned I don't think they do either particularly well.
where do we start? .
Lets talk about aerators a little more. You mentioned in the other thread that "If a pond is large enough to where the wind fetch is sufficient, then no, aeration is not needed." I beg to differ on that general statement because of all the pond contraptions on the list above, aerators are the only contraption that I've ever seen used in natural lakes. In fact the closest lake to where I live (5 miles away) has an aerator running right now. Yellow Lake And there is another lake about 10 miles away that also runs an aerator in the winter. The reason being is that these lakes have often suffered heavy fish die-off in the winter without the aerators. So if aerators are frequently needed on these large bodies of how much more important might they be in our little backyard ponds that generally have a much higher fish load?

A paper on the subject with information aeration with some info specifically about Yellow lake
 

Meyer Jordan

Tadpole
Joined
Oct 10, 2014
Messages
7,177
Reaction score
5,674
Location
Pensacola, Florida
Hardiness Zone
9a
Country
United States
Oh sure, there are many ponds I've seen that just pump their water through spitters or fountains and don't have waterfalls. I also listed Pressure filters separate from bio and mechanical filters although pressure filters usually try to include both, but as far as I'm concerned I don't think they do either particularly well.

Lets talk about aerators a little more. You mentioned in the other thread that "If a pond is large enough to where the wind fetch is sufficient, then no, aeration is not needed." I beg to differ on that general statement because of all the pond contraptions on the list above, aerators are the only contraption that I've ever seen used in natural lakes. In fact the closest lake to where I live (5 miles away) has an aerator running right now. Yellow Lake And there is another lake about 10 miles away that also runs an aerator in the winter. The reason being is that these lakes have often suffered heavy fish die-off in the winter without the aerators. So if aerators are frequently needed on these large bodies of how much more important might they be in our little backyard ponds that generally have a much higher fish load?

A paper on the subject with information aeration with some info specifically about Yellow lake
Larger, deeper bodies of water develop a thermocline. Aerators, in particular, diffusers, break this temperature barrier allowing the entire water column to be oxygenated. This is of particular importance in fishery ponds. Since garden ponds have no logical reason to be over 4 to 5 feet in depth, aeration is not considered a necessity.
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
13,070
Reaction score
13,394
Location
Northern IL
Showcase(s):
1
Oh sure, there are many ponds I've seen that just pump their water through spitters or fountains and don't have waterfalls. I also listed Pressure filters separate from bio and mechanical filters although pressure filters usually try to include both, but as far as I'm concerned I don't think they do either particularly well.

I should have said you don't see waterfalls without pumps - the reverse is definitely possible.
 

cas

Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
2,267
Reaction score
3,039
Location
NE Ohio
Showcase(s):
1
Hardiness Zone
6a
Country
United States
My thoughts on aeration: My pond is 10 feet in diameter and 34 inches deep in the center. It has a water fall at one end and a skimmer at the other. Before I started using an aerator I had sediment accumulation on the bottom. I believe my pond is not built in a way that allows for enough water circulation at the bottom using just the skimmer pump. I am wondering if the pond had been designed differently - for example, longer, not as wide, with gradual slope going from the water fall to the skimmer - would have helped. Your thoughts of a better design that would have allowed for better water circulation at the bottom without a bottom pump or aerator?
 

Meyer Jordan

Tadpole
Joined
Oct 10, 2014
Messages
7,177
Reaction score
5,674
Location
Pensacola, Florida
Hardiness Zone
9a
Country
United States
My thoughts on aeration: My pond is 10 feet in diameter and 34 inches deep in the center. It has a water fall at one end and a skimmer at the other. Before I started using an aerator I had sediment accumulation on the bottom. I believe my pond is not built in a way that allows for enough water circulation at the bottom using just the skimmer pump. I am wondering if the pond had been designed differently - for example, longer, not as wide, with gradual slope going from the water fall to the skimmer - would have helped. Your thoughts of a better design that would have allowed for better water circulation at the bottom without a bottom pump or aerator?
Can you post a photo? Do you have shelving?
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
1,993
Reaction score
1,786
Location
BC Canada
Larger, deeper bodies of water develop a thermocline. Aerators, in particular, diffusers, break this temperature barrier allowing the entire water column to be oxygenated. This is of particular importance in fishery ponds. Since garden ponds have no logical reason to be over 4 to 5 feet in depth, aeration is not considered a necessity.
Keep in mind these are "natural" lakes that required aerators (artificial circulation) . Bodies of water that as you say "the wind fetch is sufficient, that no, aeration would be needed", but they still experience fish kill, so the fact that they are natural hasn't helped them. Clearly the fact that they are "natural" hasn't stopped the fish from dying. In order for the fish to survive in these natural lakes they must employ one of these "counter to nature" "contraptions". Of course there is more going on in these lakes that require this artificial circulation then just thermoclines, since that happens in all lakes and not all lakes require artificial circulation. Also the lakes in question could probably support some type of fish like carp or koi without an aeration, but they were mainly concerned with keeping trout alive in these lakes and trout require more oxygen. But there are many lakes or large bodies of water (bigger then backyard ponds anyway), that can't support any fish life at all for various reasons. So it's not surprising that we generally must employ some contrary to nature contraptions to maintain fish life in our not so natural backyard ponds, and as a rule the smaller the pond and the heavier the fish load the more help we need.

As a side note thermoclines and stratification can and do develop in smaller ponds and pools, I have personally measured a 5 C difference between the top layer of water in my existing pond and the bottom, and since it's only 5 ft deep that's 1 deg C per foot And I've swam in swimming pools with very obvious thermoclines and a warm stratified layer on the top. (this was obviously with no pumps or aerators running).
 

Meyer Jordan

Tadpole
Joined
Oct 10, 2014
Messages
7,177
Reaction score
5,674
Location
Pensacola, Florida
Hardiness Zone
9a
Country
United States
Keep in mind these are "natural" lakes that required aerators (artificial circulation) . Bodies of water that as you say "the wind fetch is sufficient, that no, aeration would be needed", but they still experience fish kill, so the fact that they are natural hasn't helped them. Clearly the fact that they are "natural" hasn't stopped the fish from dying. In order for the fish to survive in these natural lakes they must employ one of these "counter to nature" "contraptions". Of course there is more going on in these lakes that require this artificial circulation then just thermoclines, since that happens in all lakes and not all lakes require artificial circulation. Also the lakes in question could probably support some type of fish like carp or koi without an aeration, but they were mainly concerned with keeping trout alive in these lakes and trout require more oxygen. But there are many lakes or large bodies of water (bigger then backyard ponds anyway), that can't support any fish life at all for various reasons. So it's not surprising that we generally must employ some contrary to nature contraptions to maintain fish life in our not so natural backyard ponds, and as a rule the smaller the pond and the heavier the fish load the more help we need.

As a side note thermoclines and stratification can and do develop in smaller ponds and pools, I have personally measured a 5 C difference between the top layer of water in my existing pond and the bottom, and since it's only 5 ft deep that's 1 deg C per foot And I've swam in swimming pools with very obvious thermoclines and a warm stratified layer on the top. (this was obviously with no pumps or aerators running).

A typical lake thermocline-
bucca-chart1.jpg

The thermocline (metalimnion) is that layer of water where temperatures drop drastically. Both above and below this layer water temperature generally experience only a gradual change.
Your example of a 5C difference in temperature from top to bottom in a 5 foot depth is not considered a thermocline by limnologists.
As to your reference to natural lakes, if fish kills occur in these lakes then how is it that there is still a population of fish present in these same lakes.
As I stated before, those lakes/ponds that have introduced fish (fisheries) may require aeration because an un-natural balance in the food chain is maintained in these bodies of water. The owners of these lakes/ponds experience the same problems with fish health, oxygen levels, adequate bio-conversion, etc. as do the owners of backyard garden ponds.
It is a generally accepted guideline in the science community that thermoclines do not occur in water with a depth of 4 -5 feet or less.
As I posted in the other thread, my comments as regards 'contraptions' in garden ponds are guided by the parameters that I set out. Specifically that the pond is properly designed and installed, and properly maintained.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
7,046
Reaction score
7,233
Location
Water Valley, Alberta
Showcase(s):
1
Hardiness Zone
2a
Country
Canada
...

As a side note thermoclines and stratification can and do develop in smaller ponds and pools, I have personally measured a 5 C difference between the top layer of water in my existing pond and the bottom, and since it's only 5 ft deep that's 1 deg C per foot And I've swam in swimming pools with very obvious thermoclines and a warm stratified layer on the top. (this was obviously with no pumps or aerators running).

I'm interested to know what the weather conditions were at your place for your pond to register that much difference.
I've ever only recorded a maximum of 2 degrees celcius in my pond between the 5 foot and 2 foot depth.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
30,782
Messages
508,588
Members
13,042
Latest member
lucaryan

Latest Threads

Top