I can't think of a reason DOC would be a good thing in a pond. Maybe in a Wildlife pond just because decay is part of the food chain. I never heard of DOC reducing nitrates. Can you expand?
Way below 2 microns, like below 0.5 microns. The most common dissolved organic matter...a cup of coffee or tea. That brown color would be
colored dissolved organic matter.
Hadn't heard that before. Reference? I can see it playing a small part but I think the net is a negative. I mean adding DOC to increase nitrification would seem to be a bad idea.
I have read the type of DOM that causes water discoloration is one type of dissolved organics that is resolved with carbon medium filtration, but carbon medium does not absorb all of the types of dissolved organics.
Google "DOC anaerobic bacteria
denitrification nitrates reef"
I have not scoured the google results yet to looking for more official documentation, but obviously it is a practice in maintaining reefs/coral. Nitrates even more of a concern it appears to those who keep reef and coral since just a little bit of Nitrates can dramatically damage the organism. So, there are all sorts of Nitrate absorbing filtrations and other methods to reduce Nitrates. One method was using DOCs and Nitrates to fuel the denitrification process from anaerobic bacteria. Other filtrations appear to provide some type of other inorganic carbon, in combo with Nitrates in the water, to fuel the anaerobic bacteria.
I got the 2 micron or less figure from a forum that mentioned that the water able to pass through a 2 micron filter is clean enough to drink. They then later clarified that DOCs can be anywhere from 1 micron, .7 micron, .2 micron; as ya mentioned, all about the context.
I mean adding DOC to increase nitrification would seem to be a bad idea.
DOC added to increase
denitrification, not nitrification.
Other than the foam not being aesthetic and potentially reducing O2 penetration by floating on the water, I have not read anything ... yet ... that has said worse.
It would seem like the actual decomposition of "big bits" such as leaves, process of reducing this all the way down to .2 micron "tiny bits", would require much more O2 than just the foam floating on top of the water unless such good volume of floating foam to block O2 penetration into the water.
So the term DOC is a context type deal. Dead leaves don't cause foam, super tiny bits of dead leaves do.
Well, "super tiny bits of" came from a source of "much bigger bits" If dead leaves are allowed through decompsition to become "super tiny bits", then you could say dead leaves indirectly cause foam after decomposition.
We're both kind of spit balling here. I would definitely like to read something that from more of an official capacity; not to say there is none, I just have not found it yet.