@yorkshire pudding - I just read the news this morning about the lockdown in UK. Schools and universities remain open, manufacturing jobs open, construction sites open, you can leave your home to shop and exercise. Most of the lockdown advocates in the US and the rest of the world would scoff at that "lockdown". You'll still have MILLIONS of human interactions daily.
If you really expect a lockdown to work, then NO ONE leaves their home... not to shop, not to seek medical care, you can't get your cable repaired or your plumbing or anything else that fails fixed, no trash pick up, no Amazon deliveries or grocery pick ups or curbside food service... the list goes on. EVERY ONE stays home. If you get sick - you stay home because the doctors and nurses are staying home, too. You might die in your house, but it's for the greater good of "eliminating" Covid. A "lockdown" that has any kind of human interaction outside of your home will never stop a virus. All it takes is one human host to keep it moving. And that one gives it to 3 and those three give it to three more, and so on. The number grows exponentially. You can see, though, why a true lockdown wouldn't be something that a modern society would accept - we are all too dependent on one another. Your lockdown proves that. And what are we willing to see our governments do to maintain control of the lockdown? Some countries will shoot their own citizens dead in the streets if they don't comply - anyone interested in that? I mean, if the virus - which is not a disease by the way - just a virus - but if it's THAT BAD then shouldn't we be willing to go to any lengths whatsoever?
We keep hearing that another 100,000 will die in the US If we don't all (insert your favorite mitigation here). Well I just did the math - there are 61 days left in the year. Almost 8000 people die every day in the US. That's almost half a million people who will die statistically speaking, no matter what - what other mitigations are we going to take to make sure no one dies OF ANYTHING? And who will we blame when they do?
Protect the vulnerable, take any precautions that give you peace of mind, don't expect your government to "keep you safe - that's not the job of government - don't shame your family members, neighbors, or friends for the decisions they make and let's carry on with life.
@Tula I hope your friend's husband recovers quickly. We are doing much better now with treatment. Overall the death rate is way down and that includes the death rate for those who are being hospitalized. I think we've learned that putting Covid patients on a ventilator should be the last resort rather than the standard of care. Not a great idea.
@addy1 - I don't disagree with your approach... but that's an achievable goal for you with little to no impact on your daily life. What about those who need their jobs to support their families? Should they be happy to sit at home and watch their lives go down the drain because "we're all in this together"? What kind of support do we owe these people who have been pushed out of the work force because they have been deemed "non-essential"?