- Joined
- Apr 23, 2011
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi,
Newly registered and hoping to gleem some advice from experienced members. Wife and I are in the process of interviewing a few pond builders with the intention of having Koi and other fishes. So far we have narrowed down to to builders with similar visual design concept. However, they differ quite a bit with regards to the filtration system.
If it helps, we are looking to do a small stream with a run of approximately 15 feet (2 to 3 feet wide). It will drop roughly 2 feet from start of the "waterfall" to the entrance of the pond. The pond itself is 8w x 10l x 2.5d (feet).
I don't have all the exact models or names but this is what I'm looking at so far from each installer:
Installer 1: Use a submersible pump (pondmaster) and Proline pressurized filter with UV light. No skimmer as we are not at risk for leaves based on where our house is built. Does not recommend rocks in the pond. Does not recommend mechanical filters as it's more old school design. Likes the proline filter as it has a backwash lever and it's reportedly very little maintenance; though I'm having problem locating good review or fedback for this. We would like to have two branches of water falling down the mouth of the pond and being told that this will require a two pump setup.
Installer 2: Use submersible HyDrive 3200GPH placed at the bottom of a skimmer, no UV lighting, using a mechanical/filter system that requires once a year changing, recommends rocks in the pond for ecology. He does not like the Proline pressureized filter with backflow because he feels they add a lot of maintenance/complexity. Would like to have two branches of water falling down the mouth of the pond and told that one pump is adequate for the task. Lastly recommends limited use of lava rock to help with the ecology; not sure where he will place them as I understand submerged would be problematic.
As a newbie in this arena, the internet provides overwhelming amount of information and often dated, conflicting or controversial. Based on current technology, is one design philosophy better than the other. We would like to put an emphasis on low maintenance but a healthy eco-system is far more important if the difference is appreciable.
Both installers seems very knowledgeable so having conflicting information for us un-initiated is quite confusing. Can you help educate us; feel free to add any other option not presented to us or if you have specific models that would work well for our proposed system.
Best Regards
Newly registered and hoping to gleem some advice from experienced members. Wife and I are in the process of interviewing a few pond builders with the intention of having Koi and other fishes. So far we have narrowed down to to builders with similar visual design concept. However, they differ quite a bit with regards to the filtration system.
If it helps, we are looking to do a small stream with a run of approximately 15 feet (2 to 3 feet wide). It will drop roughly 2 feet from start of the "waterfall" to the entrance of the pond. The pond itself is 8w x 10l x 2.5d (feet).
I don't have all the exact models or names but this is what I'm looking at so far from each installer:
Installer 1: Use a submersible pump (pondmaster) and Proline pressurized filter with UV light. No skimmer as we are not at risk for leaves based on where our house is built. Does not recommend rocks in the pond. Does not recommend mechanical filters as it's more old school design. Likes the proline filter as it has a backwash lever and it's reportedly very little maintenance; though I'm having problem locating good review or fedback for this. We would like to have two branches of water falling down the mouth of the pond and being told that this will require a two pump setup.
Installer 2: Use submersible HyDrive 3200GPH placed at the bottom of a skimmer, no UV lighting, using a mechanical/filter system that requires once a year changing, recommends rocks in the pond for ecology. He does not like the Proline pressureized filter with backflow because he feels they add a lot of maintenance/complexity. Would like to have two branches of water falling down the mouth of the pond and told that one pump is adequate for the task. Lastly recommends limited use of lava rock to help with the ecology; not sure where he will place them as I understand submerged would be problematic.
As a newbie in this arena, the internet provides overwhelming amount of information and often dated, conflicting or controversial. Based on current technology, is one design philosophy better than the other. We would like to put an emphasis on low maintenance but a healthy eco-system is far more important if the difference is appreciable.
Both installers seems very knowledgeable so having conflicting information for us un-initiated is quite confusing. Can you help educate us; feel free to add any other option not presented to us or if you have specific models that would work well for our proposed system.
Best Regards