Wild guess, there is some out of sight feature that could trap that size fish, when it decomposed the remains were disturbed and let loose
I generally agree considering that there’s apparently been a decomposing body in there for 7 weeks and I never saw it that there are definitely spots not observable from above, but if there is one silver lining to having a pond that some here consider to be “an oversized aquarium”
, it’s that there really shouldn’t be many secret spots in a 300 gallon stock pond when actually searching? A few of the bones were under a rock in an odd spot under the waterfall (it had fallen a few inches off of something else), but the rock itself was significantly smaller than the fish so even if it pinned him I have no idea how I would have missed seeing him? Odd eddies in the current could have carried a couple small bones there; there was no sign of the skull or any larger, telltale evidence. Also, the waterfall has been off a number of times since then, not sure how I could have missed it but yet I missed _something_. During the search time I honestly can’t remember if we turned off the pump/waterfall as I was focused on using the camera scope but it seems like it would have been the obvious first step to improving visibility, so who knows?
Also, my son, whose fish this was, reminded me that he wasn’t actually in perfect health, he’d been struggling with fin rot off and on in the aquarium after a freak spawning incident where he ended up getting an egg glued to his tail fin that remained glued there for a couple of months. So possibly the stress from that weakened him somehow and then going from the aquarium to the pond, even though the pond was much cleaner than the aquarium, still would have been a stressor, plus he immediately started chasing for days my one mature female to spawn as soon as they were all in there, so perhaps a fishy heart attack or something of the sort after a series of stressors?