slakker said:

I'm actually not sceptical that it works... I think it should work, but being an engineer by training, I'm curious about the efficiency comparative to other methods of water quality techniques.
Wetness in reef tanks is how "wet" or dry the "skimmate" that comes out of the skimmer is. Ideally in a reef, I want dry skimming so as not to pull out too much liquid and other DOCs. It's also needed because the collector cup is limited in size and skimming too wet fills it too quickly, but I suspect that wouldn't be an issue outdoors (unless it's so wet that you drop water levels).
I notice by my high waterfall, some bubbles to get created and they don't "pop" quickly, so I suspect I should be able to use a skimmer if I was to build one.
1) The other reason I really like/need a skimmer (FF) in my reef is I use solid carbon dosing for de-nitrification using bio-pellets. It works quite well... do you think that would translate to ponds? Anyone try?
Very good. I completely understand what ya mean now. Although, I have never heard of a noticeable loss of water in a pond protein skimmer. I understand that this type of device would impact aquariums differently due to how ya mentioned about the small collection cup, there is less water you're working with in an aquarium, and due to how much easier it is for marine water to create the foam. I think, since it is so hard to just create the foam from freshwater, that you will just appreciate what you're able to create and capture.
I totally understand the need of engineers to want to think there is always a better, more efficient, streamlined design out there. I can completely relate to that sediment. Back in the day, for a few years, I was a programmer for a computer software programming outsourcing company and I was always trying to think how I could improve the product and be more efficient by automating the project. Then, as life never goes as ya think it should, I came back to take over the family farm since my parents were getting old and needed help with it and I just did not want to see it get sold off. Now, pretty much taking care of my parents and helping my sister. I still have that desire to want to always improve the efficiency and automation in even what I do on the farm and now ponding. So, I understand what ya mean. Heck, when ya do come up with something, give a yell. :claphands:
1) The other reason I really like/need a skimmer (FF) in my reef is I use solid carbon dosing for de-nitrification using bio-pellets. It works quite well... do you think that would translate to ponds? Anyone try?
Yep, it's been tried and does work in our pond context. I have not done it, but there are many folk in the aquaponics hobby that has done it. Aquaponics is essentially like watergardening, that is where the fish pond and plant garden are combined, except aquaponics focuses more on the edible type of plants and edible fish. In aquaponics, they tend to have a quite high fish stock density and, as the plants transition between planting and harvesting, their nitrate levels can sometime reach up to 200ppm and higher !! At these high levels, the nitrates definitely start to stress their edible fish crop, which stressing a crop never ends well due to the potential stress toxins created in the crop. So, the aquaponic folk install a denitrification filter in their grow beds. When the nitrate levels are on the increase, in the grow bed, they open the denitrification filter to allow water to slowly trickle through the filter so the filter can start reducing the nitrates. They call them
Really Smart Guy (RSG) filters, denitrification filters that use charcoal or denitrification pellets. Also, these aquaponic systems are up to thousands of gallons, much like our ponds.
So, definitely, I know in theory and in practice they can translate to ponds.