Mmathis
TurtleMommy
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2011
- Messages
- 14,386
- Reaction score
- 8,409
- Location
- NW Louisiana -- zone 8b
- Hardiness Zone
- 8b
- Country
I would never have given this a 2nd thought if I hadn't run across it in 2 or 3 separate articles/forums over the past few months...... And now it's bugging me!
This is regarding the rock ledge used to disguise liner leading to the top edge of the pond.
Does it matter if you lay larger rocks on top of smaller rocks....
....smaller rocks on top of larger rocks.....
.....or mix them up......
__________________________________________
Mine tend to be mixed up, with smaller rocks used to fill in gaps. But I read that some say from a structural standpoint [?] that larger on top of smaller is better [1st example], and also that this give you more "micro" environments [pockets] for insects & stuff to live.....
For me, I want to go with what looks the best, but yes, structural integrity is important. Is this really structurally better?
This is regarding the rock ledge used to disguise liner leading to the top edge of the pond.
Does it matter if you lay larger rocks on top of smaller rocks....

....smaller rocks on top of larger rocks.....

.....or mix them up......

__________________________________________
Mine tend to be mixed up, with smaller rocks used to fill in gaps. But I read that some say from a structural standpoint [?] that larger on top of smaller is better [1st example], and also that this give you more "micro" environments [pockets] for insects & stuff to live.....
For me, I want to go with what looks the best, but yes, structural integrity is important. Is this really structurally better?