Hi can anyone advise me please size of filter for my 1800 litre pond I’ve been told bigger the better I want to run a blade waterfall 45cm wide I’ve seen 2 but I’m not sure which one will be best the pond is a raised pond 6ft x 5ft x2ft I do have a smaller pond I built and a 1500 litre filter but it’s not powerful enough for the blade
general rule of thumb is to turn the water over 1-1/2 times per hour. The first pump notes its output at about that--2500 lph, the second says nothing. So, I'd opt for the first.
Now, further considerations and I don't know how far into this you've got, so bear with me. ANYTHING underwater, is going to be more of a pita to service. Might not bother you initially, but it gets old over time. So, make this easy to service, which MIGHT mean considering something like a bog filter (for many many other great reasons besides the fact you DON'T have to service it other than thinning plants occasionally).
Second, you don't need the UV if your plan includes options that challenge whether free floating algae (which is WHY these companies include the UV light as these two models seem to have) that typicall happens when you don't plan for it. Again, a bog and some surface coverage will help you immensely.
If you haven't already got the idea I'm trying to lead you down the bog filtration path, to search here and do some reading then decide if you want either of these two filters, then I'll flat out say it; a bog filter will cure a LOT of common ponding problems.
So, MAYBE you DO go the bog route; you'll STILL then have a question with regard to your blade and pump output/power, right? So, let's head there...same rule of 1-1/2 times turnover applies, so IF you were to get just a pump now, get something in the area of 2500 lph. That said, let me now nudge you to go bigger, simply because pumps will pump their output but start getting cranky when you want to LIFT this water output into the air and over the pond surface. This is called head pressure (along with ALL and ANY fittings, hose, etc attched, this creates a backloop of force which will drop your output lower than you want/intend). So, how high your blade is ABOVE the water surface + plumbing hose type + hose fittings will determine what you want. It CAN be calculated but it's just a lot easier to do this; get yourself the 1-1/2 X pump, put a LARGER adaptor on the output end, then a wye or tee which gives you TWO leads. On each lead, put a ball valve. This gives you control. You'll then either send all or part of your output to your blade DEPENDANT on what your vision IS for this blade. Low flow, hight flow, doesn't matter as you control this now with the 2 valves. If you achieve what you want with one feed, the extra can go into the other and to whatever fixture or just dump into the pond as surface agitation or whatnot. Lots of leeway and options this way. The key here is the larger-than-output adaptor. In my case, my output is 1-1/2" so I used a 3" adaptor, then a wye, then two reducers (back to 1-1/2") and on to my two feeds. Got one going to a waterfall (btw, I put the ball valves AT the waterfall and AT the endpoint of the other feed so I can easily adjust; they are NOT UW and hard to get at!) and the other line goes to bog filter #1. Since I have TWO pumps, I actually have FOUR lines, 2 each for redundancy.
Anyway, long answer, I know, but wanted you to think about your choice(s) and hopefully find something easy and that fits your ultimate vision.