We bought two water lilies in August last year for our then new small pond (1800 litres), one locally and one from amazon.de. It was relatively late in the season but they both did reasonably well.
The one through amazon had no name and the local one was named “Nymphaea White” (the packaging said http://www.lookonwaterplants.com but it doesn’t appear to exist). Last year the former had about eleven pads by end of season, losing some and gaining more while the latter had about five.
(viz. above image. Locally bought below, amazon.de above)
The plants were allowed to winter in place, at the bottom of the pond (about 60 cm) and it was quite a harsh winter.
In a post last year, not knowing the name of the larger padded lily, and based on the fact that it had many leaves at the base of the plant when we got it, it was suggested that it was spatterdock (Nuphar Lutea). However, this year it has already produced about 13 pads and also a flower, that is the typical Nymphaea Alba…..
..although not fully open when the photo was taken.
The other one, which was named as “Nymphaea White”, only has five pads so far which are quite a lot smaller…..
…the three on the right, for comparison, and the lower ones in last year’s photo. Also, no flower yet.
Assuming that they are both Nymphaea Alba, is the smaller one a different sub-species, is it stunted or does it have a problem or is there that much variation between the pads in different plants? It had a smaller root than the other and is in a slightly smaller pot. They are both at about 60 cm depth.
Ooi, the “foam” that you can see in this year’s photos, is that a problem? It seems to be associated with hot sun (at the moment it is 6.30 pm and there is no/negligible foam). We have had at least fourteen toads (Green European) in the pond with a lot of spawn and currently there are many tadpoles swimming around. Ammonia tests show nothing and the Ph, although a bit high, is still under 8.8. I’m in Bulgaria and it is 20C (68F) in the shade at 6.30 pm.
The one through amazon had no name and the local one was named “Nymphaea White” (the packaging said http://www.lookonwaterplants.com but it doesn’t appear to exist). Last year the former had about eleven pads by end of season, losing some and gaining more while the latter had about five.

(viz. above image. Locally bought below, amazon.de above)
The plants were allowed to winter in place, at the bottom of the pond (about 60 cm) and it was quite a harsh winter.
In a post last year, not knowing the name of the larger padded lily, and based on the fact that it had many leaves at the base of the plant when we got it, it was suggested that it was spatterdock (Nuphar Lutea). However, this year it has already produced about 13 pads and also a flower, that is the typical Nymphaea Alba…..

..although not fully open when the photo was taken.
The other one, which was named as “Nymphaea White”, only has five pads so far which are quite a lot smaller…..

…the three on the right, for comparison, and the lower ones in last year’s photo. Also, no flower yet.
Assuming that they are both Nymphaea Alba, is the smaller one a different sub-species, is it stunted or does it have a problem or is there that much variation between the pads in different plants? It had a smaller root than the other and is in a slightly smaller pot. They are both at about 60 cm depth.
Ooi, the “foam” that you can see in this year’s photos, is that a problem? It seems to be associated with hot sun (at the moment it is 6.30 pm and there is no/negligible foam). We have had at least fourteen toads (Green European) in the pond with a lot of spawn and currently there are many tadpoles swimming around. Ammonia tests show nothing and the Ph, although a bit high, is still under 8.8. I’m in Bulgaria and it is 20C (68F) in the shade at 6.30 pm.

