New pond (tank) in Nebraska

Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
3,214
Reaction score
1,296
Location
Phoenix AZ
I use baking soda, but adding a little from time to time is not something I would do. I test KH and that tells how much to add if any. I think in general adding a little doesn't have much effect. A lot of people like stuff that dissolve slowly like oyster shell, but again, not a lot of control, slow response. I think a lot of people are adverse to any chemical looking stuff. I assume oyster shell would provide some trace elements so that could be a plus.

I think there are probably a lot of minerals used by bacteria and other things. I kind of had to draw a line of where I would stop testing. For my ponds I assumed trace minerals came into the pond via water changes, plants, rocks, fish food. Long term it could be a problem, but I have to stop someplace. I would probably invest in O2 testing before magnesium. GH test may indicate magnesium, but not for sure.

KH is easy to test, cheap and easy to adjust and it's one of the high consumables, (O2 and ammonia the other two) so it's something I do. But for my largest pond system I doubt I add 10 pounds of baking soda in five years. Probably would have been fine never testing or adjusting. I had a really light (normal) fish load, little rain and hard city water. A pond that gets a lot of rain or high fish load would be an entirely different deal.
 
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
661
Location
Cedar Bluffs, Nebraska
Here is a picture of the platform that I made for the sediment filter, for the rocks to rest upon. I cut it out of a square piece of 1/2 polyethylene and drilled 7/16" holes in it for water to pass through. I put a few odd pieces of plastic pipe at the bottom of the tank for supports and adhered them to the bottom of the tank with 3M's 5200 Marine grade polyurethane adhesive.

If you are wondering, it was a LOT of drilling!

Gordy
 

Attachments

  • 1019105539.jpg
    1019105539.jpg
    88.2 KB · Views: 239
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
661
Location
Cedar Bluffs, Nebraska
These are the filter strainers that I am using in all the tanks. They come with two sections attached to eachother, but that was too long to fit into my filter barrels, so I detached one of them, pried the end cap off the end and attached it to the shortened piece. In the BIG tank, I will use the whole length.

They sell a filter bag to slip over the strainer, but those were quite expensive. These strainers weren't all that cheap either. I figured that as a consumable item, I wasn't going to buy the filter bags for these strainers. I am just going to buy a bag of cheap, men's tube socks! They will work just fine and a bag of what... six pair or eight for about $4-$6. Beats $12-$14 for one filter bag (no brainer there).

Gordy
 

Attachments

  • 1019105819.jpg
    1019105819.jpg
    75.8 KB · Views: 268
  • 1019105806.jpg
    1019105806.jpg
    42.3 KB · Views: 246
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
661
Location
Cedar Bluffs, Nebraska
Here are some pix of the inside of the sediment filter barrel with the support platform in place and the PVC aerator array. It's not hooked up here and no water in the tank, it is just for visualization purposes.

You might notice that there are two eye-bolts attached to the platform. I wanted the platform to fit tightly within the i.d. of the barrel, but the mouth of the barrel is a bit smaller diameter than the body of the barrel, so it isn't very easy to get the platform in and out of the barrel through the mouth at the top. I had to install the eyebolts so that I would have something to grab onto when I wanted to pull it out. I put the platform in without them once, just to test my sizing. Wow, did I cuss myself when I tried to pull it back out!

Gordy
 

Attachments

  • 1007213527.jpg
    1007213527.jpg
    42 KB · Views: 251
  • 1007213309.jpg
    1007213309.jpg
    48.6 KB · Views: 299
  • 1007213428.jpg
    1007213428.jpg
    53 KB · Views: 234
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
661
Location
Cedar Bluffs, Nebraska
I use baking soda, but adding a little from time to time is not something I would do. I test KH and that tells how much to add if any. I think in general adding a little doesn't have much effect. A lot of people like stuff that dissolve slowly like oyster shell, but again, not a lot of control, slow response. I think a lot of people are adverse to any chemical looking stuff. I assume oyster shell would provide some trace elements so that could be a plus.

I think there are probably a lot of minerals used by bacteria and other things. I kind of had to draw a line of where I would stop testing. For my ponds I assumed trace minerals came into the pond via water changes, plants, rocks, fish food. Long term it could be a problem, but I have to stop someplace. I would probably invest in O2 testing before magnesium. GH test may indicate magnesium, but not for sure.

KH is easy to test, cheap and easy to adjust and it's one of the high consumables, (O2 and ammonia the other two) so it's something I do. But for my largest pond system I doubt I add 10 pounds of baking soda in five years. Probably would have been fine never testing or adjusting. I had a really light (normal) fish load, little rain and hard city water. A pond that gets a lot of rain or high fish load would be an entirely different deal.

Waterbug,

I really desire to not use any chemicals, personally. If I can set the system up really well, so that it is nearly, completely self-sustaining, that would be best. I am certain that my bait fish won't care much at all. They are pretty tough and hardy and can live in all sorts of muck and poor water. But, I do want the bacteria cultures to thrive. They are going to be my hired hands for keeping the water clean. If I eventually get this whole system set up based on nature's own design, it will be much better off. I have lots of freedom to adapt, improvise and design this system. I have the space and the time and, since it is above ground, I can make changes easily and revamp something if it doesn't work out well.

Just out of curiousity, can a person use ground chicken egg shells for calcium? Or are oyster shells better?

Gordy
 

HARO

Pondcrastinator
Joined
Jun 30, 2011
Messages
5,438
Reaction score
6,231
Location
Ontario, Canada
Hardiness Zone
5b
Country
Canada
Gordy; for what it's worth I use dried, ground-up egg shells to provide calcium for my pigeons. They should work as well as oyster shells for your purposes, and the prise is right. Also, around here we can't get oyster shell any more. The story is that Obama has put an end to the stripping of oyster beds to help the environment. See, even Canadians can blame your president for SOME things!!! John
 
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
661
Location
Cedar Bluffs, Nebraska
Gordy; for what it's worth I use dried, ground-up egg shells to provide calcium for my pigeons. They should work as well as oyster shells for your purposes, and the prise is right. Also, around here we can't get oyster shell any more. The story is that Obama has put an end to the stripping of oyster beds to help the environment. See, even Canadians can blame your president for SOME things!!! John

Haro,

"Price is right", that was what I was thinking, too! Thanks. And thank you for the political smile (I am not fond of B.O. myself)! Ha Ha Ha!

Gordy
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
3,214
Reaction score
1,296
Location
Phoenix AZ
The issue comes down to bio load. If you have a tank chuck full of fish you'll probably need a lot of bio filters which means a lot of acid. Slow release materials may not be able to handle the load. I'm not sure in this type of deal you really get much of a choice.

If the load is small you may not need to add any buffering at all if your source water already had high KH.

In between those extremes all options are available.
 
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
661
Location
Cedar Bluffs, Nebraska
The issue comes down to bio load. If you have a tank chuck full of fish you'll probably need a lot of bio filters which means a lot of acid. Slow release materials may not be able to handle the load. I'm not sure in this type of deal you really get much of a choice.

If the load is small you may not need to add any buffering at all if your source water already had high KH.

In between those extremes all options are available.

I suppose I am quite premature to be discussing the KH and other chemistry issues. I still have quite a bit of work to get done and I don't even have any fish for the tank yet. That will come this spring. This winter will be spent evaluating the heating needs. But, at least now I know some of the specific points to be concerned with (for the water chemistry). I should have plenty of time over this winter to get a lot of research accomplished.

Gordy
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
30,784
Messages
508,601
Members
13,043
Latest member
cisifom

Latest Threads

Top