Activated charcoal or Activated Carbon, which to use

Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
6,275
Reaction score
2,818
Location
Plymouth
Hardiness Zone
7a
Country
United Kingdom
Well first of all carbon is carbon chemically. The biggest difference between a charcoal brickette and an Activated charcoal lump is physical, the brickette is usually compressed, the brickette may also have some binders, and some things to help it light like wax, oil or even sodium nitrate, both are probably not good to put into your pond. Activated Charcoal is usually the product of pyrolysis (heating without oxygen) of wood or coconut fiber and is a light porous material, and has a surface area on the order of acres per teaspoon. AC is very good for adsorbing chemicals from a fluid like air or water. The brickquette being compressed will not adsorb anywhere near as much as AC would.
If you're going to us a grilling charcoal, get one of the more expensive ones that still looks like wood with visible grain and pores, and doesn't have any adulterants added to increase light ability. Personally I'd either us AC for lab or industrial use or make my own so I'd know what's in it.

I have to agree with @budgenator about his comments about Activated Charcoal and its us of
Perdsonally coconut AC was my favorite form of Activated Charcoal to use however this was from my days of indoorboth tropical fish koi keeping .
It can be bought in bulk

http://www.thomasnet.com/products/activated-carbon-10660207-1.html

Dav e
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
30,925
Messages
510,127
Members
13,138
Latest member
Noelia5838

Latest Threads

Top