This is where I am getting confused.
Based on the first above quote pH has been higher than 8.5, but has evidently lowered.
Based on the second quote Ph would not lower but would remain at the higher level.
These two (2) statements are contradictory, hence one of them can not be true.
This is the source of my confusion.
The KH will only be effective against acids lowering the PH.
If the pond is low in calcium, the PH can still slowly creep up, but I don't think that this pond's PH level is so high that it needs any intervention.
The accuracy of the guage gardenlady is using is +/- 0.1 PH.
I suspect that gardenlady has a fairly clean pond (not a lot of decomposing organic matter) with a fair amount of filtration and aeration.
I wouldn't say stabilize, but I would say prevent from being lowered. Splitting hairs, maybe.![]()
I think we sould take the higher reading here Meyer the readings are bourne out by the ph meter if it is correctly caibrated which gardenlady says she did before testing as Mitch says it has an accuracy of +/-0,1 ph , thats then two readings of Ph 8.5 and not the lower Ph reading of Ph 7.6 as it then makes sense .
Dave