Which is better aerator, waterfall or fountain?

Joined
May 25, 2018
Messages
10
Reaction score
2
Location
Eastern MA
Hardiness Zone
7a
Country
United States
New-to-me 800+ gal. pond has an old but powerful Little Giant pump driving a fairly tall concrete waterfall.

I am contemplating getting a pump with better efficiency, and then I came to wonder if a fountain would or would not be better at aerating than the waterfall.

Pond has minimal goldfish load (but changing!), large plants, frogs.

So... waterfall versus fountain, for aeration/efficiency/fish enjoyment?
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
7,046
Reaction score
7,240
Location
Water Valley, Alberta
Showcase(s):
1
Hardiness Zone
2a
Country
Canada
I think a waterfall is better because it also provides extra surface area for a biofilm to develop.
Make sure you try and include as much water circulation as possible - place the pump at the opposite end of the pond from where the waterfall is.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Messages
67
Reaction score
10
Location
Boston
I have 3 small waterfalls. When I have them off for cleaning etc. water loss is minimum. Will it be ok if I turn off the falls at night and just use the aerator? No Koi just some goldfish I don't feed and I think there's a frog in there too. Also the same pump sends water to the filter.
Thanks
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
30,922
Messages
510,004
Members
13,130
Latest member
Miker

Latest Threads

Top