Devastated, lost most of my pond goldfish

Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
6,275
Reaction score
2,817
Location
Plymouth
Hardiness Zone
7a
Country
United Kingdom
Maria as a matter of interest did you do an autopsy on the fishes gills and if so where they damaged or discoloured in anyway please ?
It's something we always do after weve had a death it can tell you alot out what has been ging on these last few days or more.

Dave
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
6,275
Reaction score
2,817
Location
Plymouth
Hardiness Zone
7a
Country
United Kingdom
I am thinking the same as you Mitch. I can't get it out of my head that this was some form of chemical intrusion. All of the signs are there.

Woudnt a chemical intrusion leave tell tale residual signs like staining of the water" though Mitch" you know like the rainbow style effects you get with fuel or staining to the sides of the stock tank where the flow entrerd the pond in the first instant ?.
I would have thought, that any form of chemical intrusion would taken all her fish at once dont you think ?
Superverm is the only organophosphate thats leathal to goldfish that I can name ?

Dave
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
7,046
Reaction score
7,233
Location
Water Valley, Alberta
Showcase(s):
1
Hardiness Zone
2a
Country
Canada
Without a complete water quality test Dave, all we can do is guess.
It makes sense to me that smaller fish would succumb to a chemical pollutant before larger fish.
If any runoff came from landscaping materials, (dyes, herbicides, fertilizers, insecticides, ect) then it's hard to say what exactly could have caused the deaths.

Hopefully Maria finds a spot where surface runoff had entered her pond and fixes it.
I think we've all given it our best shot at trying to figure this out, though.(y)

.
 

Meyer Jordan

Tadpole
Joined
Oct 10, 2014
Messages
7,177
Reaction score
5,674
Location
Pensacola, Florida
Hardiness Zone
9a
Country
United States
Woudnt a chemical intrusion leave tell tale residual signs like staining of the water" though Mitch" you know like the rainbow style effects you get with fuel or staining to the sides of the stock tank where the flow entrerd the pond in the first instant ?.
I would have thought, that any form of chemical intrusion would taken all her fish at once dont you think ?
Superverm is the only organophosphate thats leathal to goldfish that I can name ?

Dave

In answer to the first question, not all toxic chemicals have an 'oily' base, i.e. DDT, Round-up, etc.
Second question, not necessarily. It depends on level of exposure and exposure duration. The Sarin gas attack in Japan killed many almost instantly, others survived for a period after exposure and others, at the fringe of exposure, recovered.

There are many organophosphates and carbanates on the market that are extremely toxic to many animals including fish. Just a partial list includes-
Nuvan, dichlorvos, chloropyrifos, Dimethoate, triazophos, profenofos, carbofuran and carbaryl, etc.
Or more can be read here: http://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,4570,7-153-10370_12150_12220-27249--,00.html
 

Mmathis

TurtleMommy
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
13,893
Reaction score
8,087
Location
NW Louisiana -- zone 8b
Hardiness Zone
8b
Country
United States
It makes sense to me that smaller fish would succumb to a chemical pollutant before larger fish.

.
Please explain. I've read that with O2 deprivation, while not the same thing, the larger fish are the most susceptible. Wouldn't it be the same?
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
7,046
Reaction score
7,233
Location
Water Valley, Alberta
Showcase(s):
1
Hardiness Zone
2a
Country
Canada
Please explain. I've read that with O2 deprivation, while not the same thing, the larger fish are the most susceptible. Wouldn't it be the same?

Same idea as a canary in a coal mine, TM.
Smaller animal, higher metabolism, exposed to the same concentration of poison.
The canary will succumb to poisonous gases before humans.
Larger, slower moving fish have lower metabolism, so it will take longer for the ingested poison to reach lethal levels.
 

Meyer Jordan

Tadpole
Joined
Oct 10, 2014
Messages
7,177
Reaction score
5,674
Location
Pensacola, Florida
Hardiness Zone
9a
Country
United States
Please explain. I've read that with O2 deprivation, while not the same thing, the larger fish are the most susceptible. Wouldn't it be the same?
Same idea as a canary in a coal mine, TM.
Smaller animal, higher metabolism, exposed to the same concentration of poison.
The canary will succumb to poisonous gases before humans.
Larger, slower moving fish have lower metabolism, so it will take longer for the ingested poison to reach lethal levels.

If I may.
We are talking Apples and Oranges. On one hand we are describing depriving an organism of an essential element (Oxygen) required to sustain survival. On the other hand we are describing the major disruption of physiological processes by the external introduction of a toxic substance.
 

Mmathis

TurtleMommy
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
13,893
Reaction score
8,087
Location
NW Louisiana -- zone 8b
Hardiness Zone
8b
Country
United States
If I may.
We are talking Apples and Oranges. On one hand we are describing depriving an organism of an essential element (Oxygen) required to sustain survival. On the other hand we are describing the major disruption of physiological processes by the external introduction of a toxic substance.
And to @MitchM But does it still hold true that low O2 will hit the larger fish first? And toxins will hit the smaller fish first?
___________________________
And on another, related note, if your O2 levels are good, all of your water parameters are good and consistently so, and [as far as you know] there are no outside toxins getting into the water, is it possible that there's something "toxic" being created in the pond that could hurt the fish? No, that doesn't really make sense because I would think anything like that would also affect the water parameters....... Hmmmmm.......

OK, then is there any way you could TEST for this? No, that goes back to water parameters......

Darn! I'm frustrated because I've been having a similar problem as @bettasngoldfish, though not as devastating. Just finding the occas. dead fish with no evidence of illness or injury; nothing showing up on microscopic exam [that I can find]. At first this was happening around the time we'd have some really bad thunderstorms so was suspecting lightening. But it's still happening -- a fish here, a fish there. Small to med-sized fish. My trapdoor snail population is thriving. I'm finding viable snails of all sizes, so know they have to be different generations. And my tadpoles are thriving. I tend to see them as a barometer. So what can be going on if nothing is going on??
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Messages
3,211
Reaction score
2,192
Location
North East Ohio-Zone 5
Country
United States
After looking around the pond there is only one area that *might* allow run off to enter the pond (and it happens to be on my neighbors side) I have a small preform tub with water fall that drops into the pond. I can't see under it at the moment because of all the rocks around it. When I get the pond emptied I am also planning to pick up the preform and check the pond edging underneath it. Otherwise I don't see anywhere else water could flow into the pond. Unless of course someone purposely dumped something in the pond. I know I didn't add any chemicals myself and neither did my husband.
 

Mmathis

TurtleMommy
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
13,893
Reaction score
8,087
Location
NW Louisiana -- zone 8b
Hardiness Zone
8b
Country
United States
@bettasngoldfish See, that's what confuses me, as well. There just isn't any way that anything is going into the pond unless it's the "mosquito truck," but it's been so dry here lately that they haven't sprayed in quite a while. We do have a pest control service that sprays every 3 months, but our guy knows to stay away from the pond and the turtle habitat. I've watched him and he goes around the house foundation and the spray is more of a squirt than a spray -- hardly any way for it to aerosolize and drift toward the pond.
 

Meyer Jordan

Tadpole
Joined
Oct 10, 2014
Messages
7,177
Reaction score
5,674
Location
Pensacola, Florida
Hardiness Zone
9a
Country
United States
And to @MitchM But does it still hold true that low O2 will hit the larger fish first? And toxins will hit the smaller fish first?
___________________________
And on another, related note, if your O2 levels are good, all of your water parameters are good and consistently so, and [as far as you know] there are no outside toxins getting into the water, is it possible that there's something "toxic" being created in the pond that could hurt the fish? No, that doesn't really make sense because I would think anything like that would also affect the water parameters....... Hmmmmm.......

OK, then is there any way you could TEST for this? No, that goes back to water parameters......

Darn! I'm frustrated because I've been having a similar problem as @bettasngoldfish, though not as devastating. Just finding the occas. dead fish with no evidence of illness or injury; nothing showing up on microscopic exam [that I can find]. At first this was happening around the time we'd have some really bad thunderstorms so was suspecting lightening. But it's still happening -- a fish here, a fish there. Small to med-sized fish. My trapdoor snail population is thriving. I'm finding viable snails of all sizes, so know they have to be different generations. And my tadpoles are thriving. I tend to see them as a barometer. So what can be going on if nothing is going on??

It is easy to forget that fish, like all other animals, are subject to die at any age from what are usually described as 'natural causes'. It all goes back to the tenet "survival of the fittest". Inherited genetic weaknesses and predisposition to succumb to certain illnesses is well documented. Although the fatality rate may not be as high in humans because we have the ability to treat ourselves, these genetic weaknesses are still there as evidenced by the incident of illness in humans.
Just because we provide our finned friends with a controlled environment, the positive and negative aspects of which can be debated, does not automatically endow them with a greater protection from the natural order of things. If they are genetically weak they are subject to a greater danger from their environment, a danger that may come in different forms depending on the particular genetic weakness(s).
The occasional death of a fish maybe should trigger an alert to be more observant but should not be a cause for alarm because it may be..... the natural order of things.
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Messages
3,211
Reaction score
2,192
Location
North East Ohio-Zone 5
Country
United States
@bettasngoldfish See, that's what confuses me, as well. There just isn't any way that anything is going into the pond unless it's the "mosquito truck," but it's been so dry here lately that they haven't sprayed in quite a while. We do have a pest control service that sprays every 3 months, but our guy knows to stay away from the pond and the turtle habitat. I've watched him and he goes around the house foundation and the spray is more of a squirt than a spray -- hardly any way for it to aerosolize and drift toward the pond.

We have trucks that go around spraying for mosquito here too. Living by the lake the skeeters can get bad. But I doubt that it has anything to do with the deaths of my fish. They spray every summer and it hasn't caused any trouble before.

Besides I have fish in my stock tank and they are fine. Do you keep any fish in your stock tanks Maggie? If so, have they been okay?
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
30,781
Messages
508,574
Members
13,042
Latest member
lucaryan

Latest Threads

Top